I thought with this posting I would divide the post into topic areas that I would refer back to the future.
Over the last year there has been a lot of demonization of Wall Street, Bankers and just about anything associated with the financial industry. During good times, prior to 2007, very little attention was paid to the computer aided financial innovation which sparked to boom and lead to the bubble bursting in 2007. Lack of regulatory oversight was the most important factor leading to the current Global financial meltdown. Government regulators, economists, bankers and politicians falsely believed that we were living in a "different era" where the "free market" should not be burdened by regulation, because the markets could regulate themselves. The great economist John Maynard Keynes used the term "Animal Spirits" to describe emotion and effects to describe human behavior. Animal Spirit lead to the irrational exuberance that was combined with computer-aided financial creativity has lead to what we are now experiencing with the economic meltdown. Before this financial meltdown most business leaders, government officials and most economists believe in universal rationality. When former federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan testified before congress that he was wrong in his belief that people and financial institutions act rational, it was an end of an era.
So what's next for the financial institutions? Certainly governments around the world will impose more regulation, but what else can be done to reduce systemic risk to the global financial system? I would argue that was is needed is more transparency and injection of what I call "Wiki DNA".
Financial markets and the Wiki DNA
Everyone is familiar with Wikipedia the free global online encyclopedia with millions of articles in dozens of languages. Wikipedia collaborative style of authoring has forever changed the human knowledge landscape, because prior to Wikipedia, institutions both private and public, where the authority and decimator of knowledge. Wikipedia collaborative style of publishing allows anyone to express their point of view about a topic and shows when their is conflict about a topic from various contributors. Wikipedia has over 50 million unique visitors every month, it is a major destination on the Internet. There is no chief editor or controlling authority that determine what will and will not be published. Individuals and institutions contribute to Wikipedia with no financial incentive, only out of their sense of sharing. What if we injected the Wikipedia DNA into our financial systems and regulations. What would that look like? Financial institutions could still be innovative within a regulated environment that probably require more capital and less leveraging. The one requirement I would say is that new financial instruments and their ratings from the ratings agencies are published in an standard open format and available to anyone over the Internet. Some information would be excluded to protect privacy of the issuer, but could be tracked with a universal id assigned to a particular instrument. Open dissemination of financial information, such as financial instruments would lead to new millions examining the information with new software tools and websites, some of these resources would be free and open like a Wikipedia and others maybe created by new start-ups companies focused utilizing this deluge of information. Combine the social innovation which is in the Wikipedia DNA with regulations and I belief we can have systemic risk management and innovation in the financial markets.
Next I'll cover at a high level the technologies availabe today to unleash a new financial industry risk management framework.